I enjoyed Haywire as a cool-breeze exercise in spy subgenre
entertainment when I first saw it in theaters. Subsequent viewings have allowed
me to better appreciate how Soderbergh experimented with his own auteur
elements in tandem with said subgenre. More and more his work as a director
reminds me of that classic 'falling hats' gag from Looney Tunes with Bugs Bunny
and Elmer Fudd assuming the personalities of whichever style hat that lands on
their heads.
The fight scenes are unusual. Carano performs a number of
elaborate martial arts techniques that are somehow weirdly, even
surrealistically, understated by Soderbergh’s detached, borderline clinical
presentation, cutting at most between two or three master-to-medium-master
camera positions. We’re seeing a yin and yang of sorts: the extraordinary
displayed in a manner of the ordinary; the latter not negating the former, but
strangely complementing it. We hear the film on the same level as well. Its
sound design feels not designed, but captured, documentric. Kicks and punches
are acoustically muted. A car chase through snowy woods is heard not as the
typical, articulated and over-layered multi-track array of engine accelerations
and screeching metal, but as one would hear it sitting in the back seat of the
cab. Shots fired and bullet impacts register as *pops* and *clinks*. I’ve read
a lot of complaints online that all of these elements lessen the impact of the
action but I personally think it has its own quality. I also think interesting
Soderbergh's approach to the digital cinematography. Haywire is not a
particularly "pretty" looking film, but the gauzy soft focus and the
high contrast between shifting, heavy filtered color palettes -- as determined
by different locations -- does make for some arresting imagery.
I almost get the sense that Soderbergh was aiming to create
a kind of direct-to-video experience, only through calculation of the medium
instead of limitation in budget or via simple lack of skill. In other words, he
did it artfully, elevating a lowbrow form to something uniquely expressive. A
lot of people seem to look past that at what they see as a mere cheaply made
film of no consequence. Well, it may indeed be of no consequence -- an
unassuming January release -- but I think it works with a genuine novel style
nonetheless. I dig it.
Gina Carano doesn’t appear to be all that great an actress.
She doesn’t even have much screen presence in terms of personality. What she
does exude, however, is a pure physical, able-bodied presence. She’s like a
machine to a certain extent, and Soderbergh has effectively molded the film to
her nature. His very choice in casting Carano is a clear echo of his casting
porn star Sasha Grey in the lead role of The Girlfriend Experience. Centering
the films on these non-actresses is intriguing in the way it challenges
Soderbergh to construct storytelling as an extension of their occupations. Grey
was a real life fuck toy playing the role of a socialite-specialty escort, an
emotional toy for lonely corporate men seeking solace in the company of a
perfect, always attentive female companion. Therapy porn.
Here, Carano is a real life MMA fighter who's playing a
state-of-the-art, globally operational weapon. Grey’s character was largely
internalized, reconciling the economic related stress of her fading clientele
with her personal life/boyfriend, which resulted in numerous scenes of her
sitting in rooms, deep in conversation, trying to make best sense of it all.
Haywire is simpler in that Carano’s character is an external force with a
purposeful resolve; ambushed by her handlers for mere profit, thereby
justifiably pissed. Hers is a narrative almost entirely tactical: moving,
fighting, evading, anticipating. Essentially, her character is her mission,
whatever she is doing-pursuing from one scene to the next. And it works. There’s also a kind of blandness to her countenance that is appropriate for the part. I dig how Carano is not some exotic waif like Jolie or Saldana or Beckinsale or any other female star in their respective action-heroine roles. Instead, she has this homegrown, common place attractiveness, while her impressive athletic bulk and remarkable utilitarian attributes is more than enough to hold the big screen. Given the right circumstances, I could watch her all day.
The surrounding cast lends the film much of its charming
personality. Ewan McGregor is dastardly without being ridiculous. He’s snake
oil personified, but without succumbing to a second rate Bond villain
caricature. I like the way Michael Fassbender is depicted coldly in the first
half of the film up until his death, then later through flashbacks conveys the
slightest touch of humanity. That was a nice little narrative technique that
allowed the audience to retrofit his character after the fact. Channing Tatum
is a bit smarter and more likable than the usual dead weight that results from
his casting. Bill Paxton does a fine job as the loyal and sympathetic father,
and I really liked his brief moment of horror upon realizing just how deadly
efficient of a soldier his daughter has become. Veteran Michael Douglas is good
as the pragmatic and partially neutral government wise man and a laid back
Antonio Banderas gets the funniest moment in the film; the crowd I saw it with
gave a cheering laugh at his closing line. Again, I enjoyed it. It really wasn’t the most dramatic action film in terms of story but the process was experimental and fun. The only thing is, I’m still not quite sure why it’s called "Haywire". Does it refer to something specific or is it just a title that Soderbergh thought sounded rad?
No comments:
Post a Comment