[Reiterated from a previous blog]
'The Best of Both Worlds' by Jonathan Rosenbaum
A.I. Artificial Intelligence - A Visual Study Part I and Part 2 by Ben Sampson
Stanley Kubrick was not an idiot. He wasn't naïve about Steven Spielberg as a filmmaker. There is a very specific reason he chose Spielberg to direct this film, and one that proves effective once you look beyond the surface-level sentimentalism. People think Kubrick would have rightly subverted the material had he directed, while not realizing the obviousness of such an outcome: Spielberg was the subversion, and a masterstroke of genius it was on Kubrick’s part to assign him the film. Moreover, Spielberg was not unaware of these reasons either, nor is he unable to recognize his own filmmaking sensibility and seize it antithetically when necessary.
We never see the outside placement of Harry and Monica's house. We never get a sense of just where exactly they live. This may seem trivial at first, but consider how common a practice it is in film to begin each new scene or setting with an establishing location shot i.e., a home, workplace, police station, castle etc. There's a general sense of geography that never really happens in A.I. The home of David's adopters seems to materialize from the inside out of nowhere – nowhere, in fact, becomes a place of its own in this film; because while the affordable livings and social lifestyles of Harry and Monica implies an upscale suburban setting, the small glimpses of their outside surroundings reveals just the opposite.
Behind Monica when she first encounters David is a open balcony revealing windblown trees beyond. During the couple's first sit-down meal with David in the dining room, notice through the background window a forest stretching the evening horizon. No streets, no neighborhoods; just endless wilderness under dark, watery ambiance. In later scenes we see Monica, David and Martin sharing a small boat along a forested lagoon, and a backyard birthday party is walled by fern and foliage, barely showing the house exterior.
Mossy primeval environments extends beyond the home setting, seemingly everywhere, on the road to Cybertronics, to the place of David’s abandonment, all-encompassing so that Flesh Fairs and even the sprawling Rouge City feel like secluded remnants of modern humankind amidst a larger natural world reborn. This of course plays into the film’s sci-fi conceit of a future Earth subject to extreme changes in climate and ecology, but it also refers the bedtime story metaphor of David’s quest for the Blue Fairy. The world depicted is at once a connotation of Christopher Robin’s Hundred Acre Wood and the inverted terrarium-like biosphere of Jurassic Park. Spielberg would revisit this aesthetic to a lesser extent and with more rainy, noirish effect in Minority Report.
The timeline
in A.I., despite its two millennia stretch, seems relative to a dream temporal.
As mentioned in the Youtube review, the film’s beginning, post Professor
Hobby’s prologue, on up to the final movement is bookended with two different
boys sleeping in cryostate. In his book 'Directed by Steven Spielberg: Poetics
of the Contemporary Hollywood Blockbuster', Warren Buckland proposes the idea
that Martin and David are one and the same, but split within a single dream as
two different individuals in contest for their mother’s love. Perhaps it is
Martin dreaming of both himself and himself as David and David’s journey or it
could be the ambitious concept that Martin dreamed David but, upon awaking,
became David, who in turn remembered the dream as himself.
Read that
last part back again to help make better sense.
Within this
dream David occupies not only the form of Martin (or vice versa) but also the
form of Gigolo Joe, as they, too, become traveling parallels of the same
psyche. Consider the fade-to-black transition from one character to the other’s
introduction, the psychological implications: David left abandoned by his
mother who is then a grown robotic version of himself, forever seeking to be
the ultimate sexual and emotional prize for all women. Cynically mirroring the
desires of Monica, now in sexual form, Joe says to his client, "I think you’re
afraid of letting go. I think you’re afraid of happiness... once you’ve had a
lover-robot you’ll never want a real man again... you deserve so much better in
life. You deserve me."
Yet I’m
beginning to wonder if Teddy is something of an R2-D2 equivalent, secretly
observing the events from an irreverent outside perspective. He certainly seems
sentient: "I am not a toy!" and more than once does he prove vital to David’s
quest, for it is Teddy who helps in David’s escape from the Flesh Fair and it
is Teddy who brings forth Monica’s DNA ripe lock of hair, which in itself proposes
an interesting idea: did Martin’s jealous scheme indirectly lead to David’s
ultimate wish fulfilled? Two of the same mind; one unconsciously serving the
other?
The
denouement to A.I. is a whopper of nihilism beset with the rosy illusion of
Hallmark sweetnes. Don’t think so? Look matter-of-factly at what is being
presented. The statement being made about the human race is not a promising
one. At first we see the externals of our failings, Global Warming’s final
coupe de grace as the world frozen over. This is harsh enough all its own. Yet
buried in the ice, so to speak, is the internal cause, one that stings the very
heart of human nature. Yes, David is granted "the happiest day of his life"
with his mother, but she is not his mother. She is not even complete human. She
is a lie.
The
Supermecha must contort the human genome in order to create an idealized
version of Monica. To resurrect the real being is to resurrect her (our)
inherent failings of responsibility beyond love. Even when Monica was real, she
never really loved David. What she felt for him was ultimately selfish. She
used David to fill the hole left by her dead son. Because the Supermecha are
great descendants of human creations, they carry on the smallest but most
potent fabric of human nature. Everything repeats itself. In the beginning the
humans create David as a lie to fill Monica’s needs; in the end the Supermecha
create Monica as a lie to fill David’s needs.
"But in the
beginning didn't God create Adam to love him?"Lastly is David himself. He's a monster, as much Frankenstein as he is Pinocchio. Rendered forever childlike and adorable, beneath the pleasantries is a spectrum of emotions made extreme. When David loves he loves absolutely and unconditionally. He's nice to his mommy. He hugs her and warms to her and makes her coffee. When darker emotions take hold David assumes strange forms and commits heinous acts. His programed loving smile behind a bedroom door glass is divided into multiple vertical planes, like a scan revealing synthetic repetition.
When
challenging Martin to an eating match, jealousy (not spinach) distorts his face
into something grotesque. He rants frantically to Joe, reaching a near state of
psychosis:
"Mommy
doesn't hate me! Because I'm special and...unique! Because there has never been
anyone like me before! ...when I am real, Mommy's going to read to me and tuck
me in my bed and sing to me and listen to what I say and she will cuddle with
me and tell me every day a hundred times a day that she loves me!" And less we forget the fact that David violently murders another David, not long before throwing himself from a skyscraper ledge; from homicide to suicide. David is a dark being. A.I. Artificial Intelligence is a dark film.
You might want to check out my second piece about A.I.:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.jonathanrosenbaum.net/2011/01/a-matter-of-life-and-death-ai-artificial-intelligence-tk/