One of my
all-time favorite directors set to take a stab at the classic fish-out-of-water
story.
It should go
without saying -- of course, there are a lot of "shoulds" in this
world -- that The Little Mermaid is not a Disney creation but originally a work
of fairy tale literature from Hans Christian Anderson, and that comparisons
with the 1989 Disney animated film is like comparing Disney’s The Jungle Book
with Kipling’s original story: vast differences, to say the least. Anderson’s
telling is hauntingly dark, psychologically rooted, sociologically reflective
(of the times in which it was written) and concludes rather fatalistically.
There are no songs. No Flounder.
I know a lot
of people think very little of Coppola, either dismissing her on claims of
nepotism or her films for being hollow and superficial, or both. Some might
also dismiss this project as yet another cash-in on the current trend of
classic fairy tale adaptations. The latter might be true to some initial
extent, but Coppola is definitely her own auteur filmmaker and bringing her
onboard to direct, in my opinion, indicates a likelier departure from
mainstream genre tropes where a young heroine graduates to warrior princes and
gets caught up in CG set-pieces.
Coppola is
traditionally not a plot-oriented, narrative filmmaker, so I’m interested to
see how, or how much, she might venture into such storytelling, or if at all;
assuming Universal doesn’t let her take the adaptation entirely into her own
realm of fashionized, mood-piece minimalism and observationalism. Another point
of consequence for me is that, to my recollection, all of Coppola’s feature
films have been shot on various locations, whereas the fairy tale material in
question beckons the fanciful artifice that only soundstage filmmaking can
provide. I’m not sure which I find more enticing: the prospect of Coppola
delving for the first time into more overt Hollywood spectacle or that she may nonetheless
opt to render fantasy settings through immersive real world environs to
surrealistic effect. Either way should prove to be a visual splendor.
No comments:
Post a Comment